How the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decisions Impact Enterprise Communications

Two new verdicts could move technical decisions and implementation away from those who know the policies best, and lengthens the time it will take to accomplish legal adjustments to accommodate technology advancements.
At the end of its current term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued some decisions that absolutely jeopardize the validity of actions taken by federal agencies and essentially moves the interpretation(s) of those rules away from the executive branch agencies staffed with the subject-matter experts who devised the rules in the first place and towards the other two branches of government, legislative and judiciary. In Loper Bright Enterprises et al v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court chucked a 40-year precedent requiring that, in the event of ambiguous or unclear statutory language promulgated by Congress, courts should defer to the agencies where expertise resides for clarification and interpretation. The Chevron Doctrine, which was created by the high court in a 1984 case, stood for the concept that judges should defer to executive branch agencies when interpreting gaps and ambiguities in the laws they implement, so long as those interpretations are reasonable.

Click to read more ...

Reliance on AI Tools Continues to Carry Significant Risks

It’s important to know that AI outputs are best used when they are used as contributing factors and not relied upon solely for decision making
“An Algorithm Told Police She Was Safe. Then Her Husband Killed Her.” appeared in the New York Times on July 18th and it describes the downsides of using AI for life-or-death situations. The article describes an effort by Spanish authorities to rely uponan AI algorithm to categorize and assess the likelihood that previous victims of domestic violence would be assaulted again at the hands of their spouses.

Click to read more ...

Reliance on AI Tools Continues to Carry Significant Risks

It’s important to know that AI outputs are best used when they are used as contributing factors and not relied upon solely for decision making.
“An Algorithm Told Police She Was Safe. Then Her Husband Killed Her.” appeared in the New York Times on July 18th and it describes the downsides of using AI for life-or-death situations. The article describes an effort by Spanish authorities to rely uponan AI algorithm to categorize and assess the likelihood that previous victims of domestic violence would be assaulted again at the hands of their spouses.

Click to read more ...

AI in the Work Environment? Be Mindful

As AI-infused tools become part of the employee experience – from hiring to scheduling to performance assessment – it’s important to assess the risks inherent in these tools.
For a several years, I’ve been thinking and writing about ethical use of artificial intelligence both within the enterprise and beyond. While these topics remain of paramount interest to me and importance to all, given AI’s rapid deployment in various levels of the enterprise, it seems prudent to share some guidance on AI use in the context of employment, particularly from the perspective of the employer.

Click to read more ...

Net Neutrality Is On Its Way Back

However, what “net neutrality” means in a world where the Internet’s changed since the first time net neutrality was made law is still up for clarification.
As has been anticipated since Democrats took over the majority of Commissioner slots on the FCC, the network neutrality rules originally brought to bear during the Obama Administration and then removed during the Trump years, will be back.  Regardless of how you feel about the regulatory burden that this transition places will again place upon the ISPs, one thing that is indisputable is that the internet as regulated in 2015 is a completely different animal now than it was when.  Just like it used to be easy to understand the technology evolution as analog moved to digital, the word “internet,” which was the definition of a lifeline particularly during the pandemic, has so many different meanings, that “defining what the new 400 pages of net neutrality rules are designed to regulate” may become its own cottage industry.  But there is no doubt that the internet has evolved into a utility requiring a greater level of regulation and oversight than currently exists.

Click to read more ...